Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ibanez AZ Essentials
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Iron1 View PostIf I had any faith at all that Ibanez was willing to compete with Jackson, Schecter and ESP in terms of quality with sub $1500 guitars, I'd be interested... but, nope.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Chris at that price point I agree. Schecters under $1500 are better than Ibanez there, however the LTD deluxe series are a step above both. The $800-$1500 price range is where I buy guitars, and nothing in that range touches the quality of the ESP LTD Deluxe guitars.
Having said that, i still feel the Schecter (Banshee, Apocalypse)and Ibanez (Premium, Iron Label) guitars in that price range are great too. You just have to go into any Ibanez purchase knowing you're going to spend more $$$ to upgrade the pickups, and you're going to be getting a bolt on instead of a neck thru like on the Schecter or ESPs.
Comment
-
Originally posted by desertdweller View PostChris at that price point I agree. Schecters under $1500 are better than Ibanez there, however The LTD deluxe series are a step above both. The $800-$1500 proce range is where I buy guitars,, and nothing in that range touches the quality of the ESP LTD Deluxe guitars.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chris View Post
I've played a ton of $500-1000 Schecters, though admittedly not in the last 5 years or so. Up to that point they've all been straight up awesome. I've never played a bad one.
Comment
-
Originally posted by desertdweller View Post
Having said that, i still feel the Schecter (Banshee, Apocalypse)and Ibanez (Premium, Iron Label) guitars in that price range are great too. You just have to go into any Ibanez purchase knowing you're going to spend more $$$ to upgrade the pickups, and you're going to be getting a bolt on instead of a neck thru like on the Schecter or ESPs.
I also don't think that bolt-on means less quality. I have a $3500 Suhr bolt-on that's spectacular, and the next one I spec out will be bolt-on as well. I also have a bunch of EBMMs, including a pair of bolt-on BFRs that say otherwise too.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chris View PostNah all good. It's pretty, most of the IL guitars are. Every one I've played has sucked, like RG73xx level bad. All those Indo ones are just lousy.
JOIN ME IN CORK SNIFF UTOPIA VINCE OL PAL. BUY YOURSELF A SUHR.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by desertdweller View Post
Lol that's just where you and I differ in taste. For me, quality of a guitar reaches diminishing returns above the $1200 or so price range, however I find more expensive amps, preamps, power amps, etc., out perform most cheaper models. So I might pay $2300 for an amp, but I don't think I could spend that kind of cash on a guitar. But that's just me.
I love me an RG550 or old UV as much as the next guy - probably more - but something like Drew's modern 7 is just on a completely different level. It's like using a high quality set of ratches or wrenches vs. the Husky stuff that home depot sells. Guitars are tools for expression, and I've never once regretted buying a high quality tool.
Edit: Though far and away the single best guitars I've ever played are Shermans. What a goddamn shame how that all worked out (for everyone, especially all the people he screwed) because my goodness can that guy build an absolutely incredible guitar.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Interesting move. I thought the main point of the AZ series was to undercut Suhr and Anderson (which was already a little bit of a strange idea given they lack a certain...class(?) possessed by the other two). Now they've gone full on cheap by tying the AZ name with GIO level guitars.
Overall, I like the colors but the ugly AF fretboards ruin it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chris View Post
You're not wrong, but take Jackson out of that list. Schecter's entry level guitars destroy the Jacksons at the same price point IMO.Don't expect much, it's not like I'm a Rocket Surgeon...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Iron1 View Post
The Jacksons I've played just seem to have a quality control issue. Some are phenomenal, some are Ibanez quality. My HT7 is incredible. My JS22-7 is great for a $200 guitar. Both are better than any sub-$1000 new Ibanez I've touched since the 90s, and the HT7 is better than any sub $1500 one. It's like everyone else has raised the floor for lower level quality while Ibanez has just raised their prices.
I completely hate saying that, BTW, as I'd much rather play the compound radius guitars.
I'm with Chris on the Iron Label Ibbys, though.
Comment
-
Originally posted by desertdweller View Post
Lol that's just where you and I differ in taste. For me, quality of a guitar reaches diminishing returns above the $1200 or so price range, however I find more expensive amps, preamps, power amps, etc., out perform most cheaper models. So I might pay $2300 for an amp, but I don't think I could spend that kind of cash on a guitar. But that's just me.
It's been a couple years so you almost certainly didn't play my Modern 6 - my Modern 7 is an awesome guitar, and I'd prefer it spec-wise anyway but I think it stacks up as a little nicer than the nicest Ibanez guitars I've played and owned, though it's not so night-and-day different that I'd say it's definitely worth more than double the cost of a good Prestige seven - at the end of the day I'd probably still be perfectly happy playing the RG752AHM that's basically wall art backing it up, and really is an awfully good guitar, even if it's missing that extra something.
My Modern 6, though, is the most explosive, eerily resonant guitar I've ever owned, and I've played few guitars made by anyone that are its equal. I'm a better guitarist on it, it just breathes, somehow.
Back on topic - these look like budget guitars, and they are... but I am curious about the AZ series in general. They look pretty solid, spec wise.
Comment
Comment